From: Mark Goodacre (M.S.GOODACRE@bham.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Oct 02 1998 - 08:44:01 EDT
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu wrote:
> ...there appears to be no basis at all in the NT
> Greek text for the proposition being argued here--and although it is
> proposed that "the almost universal testimony of the MS evidence is
> that Hebrews is Pauline," I do wonder exactly what MS evidence is being
> referred to here...
P46 is probably worth mentioning. It is a papyrus codex of 86 leaves dating
from c. 200 and featuring epistles in this order: Romans, Hebrews, 1 Cor., 2
Cor., Eph., Gal., Phil., Col and 1 Thess. I think that this is as early as the
the paypyrus evidence will take us.
Mark
--------------------------------------
Dr Mark Goodacre mailto:M.S.Goodacre@bham.ac.uk
Dept of Theology Tel: +44 (0)121 414 7512
University of Birmingham Fax: +44 (0)121 414 6866
Birmingham B15 2TT
United Kingdom
Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/goodacre
World Without Q: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/q
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:03 EDT