From: Nichael Cramer (nichael@sover.net)
Date: Wed Jan 06 1999 - 11:50:14 EST
Nichael Cramer wrote:
> jtownsle@iupui.edu wrote:
>
> > How well accepted is it that we have Greek Gospel fragments from pre-100
> > CE (O'Callaghan's Mark fragment @60, Thiede's Matthew frag at 60, Luke
> > frag at 90, and John frag at 110)?
>
> Jeramy
>
> To answer your question quickly: These datings are accepted by virtually
> no textual scholars outside of a very small handful; i.e. O'Callaghan,
> Thiede and (maybe) a couple of others.
As is all to often the case, I was typing faster than I was thinking.
My comment above, needless to say, does not apply to the final item (which
I lumped, without thinking, with the other items). The dating of the John
Fragment (p53) to the early 2nd Cent is, of course, absolutely standard.
Nichael
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:13 EDT