Re: Mt 19:9

From: Ben Crick (ben.crick@argonet.co.uk)
Date: Thu May 13 1999 - 14:44:47 EDT


On Wed 12 May 99 (21:34:20), dixonps@juno.com wrote:
> I couldn't help but notice the misuse of logic here. Ben,
> what you are affirming is the negative inference fallacy.

 Paul,

 Thanks. Yes, I have to admit that I am affirming the negative inference
 fallacy. But then, is not also John Wenham making as dodgy an inference?

 If I may turn my syllogism into a polylogism:

 IF (P AND Q) THEN R;
   NOT P;
     Therefore NOT (P AND Q);
       Therefore, NOT R.
 Hmmmm.

 Ben

-- 
 Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
 <ben.crick@argonet.co.uk>
 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
 http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm

--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:26 EDT