Re: Fwd: AORIST VS PRESENT INFINITIVE

From: Moon-Ryul Jung (moon@saint.soongsil.ac.kr)
Date: Fri May 28 1999 - 20:47:37 EDT


The recent discussion on a sequence of aorist-present imperatives got my
attraction.
The two answers are interesting to me.
 
[Cyndy]
>The main point in 2:13 is to flee (FEUGE), and the main
point in 2:20 is to go (POREUOU). The aorist commands
to get up (EGERQEIS) and take (PARALABE) the child are
secondary and supportive to the main
points to 'flee' and 'go'.<

[Mary]
Alternatively, we can consider that this is a passage where the "rules"
of grammar work: PARALABE is aorist imperative because Joseph needs to
grab up his family only once, whereas fleeing (FEUGE) and making his way
(POREUOU) all the way to Egypt will be a process involving some time.

[Moon]

Can these theories or explanations be applied to Mark 2:

EGEIRE (present) KAI ARON (aorist) TON KRABATTON SOU KAI PERIPATEI
(present)

"Arise, take, and go".

Moon-Ryul Jung
Assistant Professor
Dept of Computer Science
Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:28 EDT