Re: Concerning Genesis 1:16

From: Dan Ebert (dellbert@buckeyeinternet.com)
Date: Mon Aug 23 1999 - 14:11:36 EDT

Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Concerning Genesis 1:16"
Previous message: Jim West: "Re: Concerning Genesis 1:16"
Maybe in reply to: Wrench: "Concerning Genesis 1:16"
Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Concerning Genesis 1:16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks Carl,

Sorry about the name thing.

Further question concerning Genesis 1:16, I am finding that when "arche" is
followed by a genitive phrase, the "arche" is part of that which is
signified in the genitive. Could that in any way be considered true in this
occurence?

Thanks,
Dan

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

Next message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Concerning Genesis 1:16"
Previous message: Jim West: "Re: Concerning Genesis 1:16"
Maybe in reply to: Wrench: "Concerning Genesis 1:16"
Next in thread: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Concerning Genesis 1:16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:36 EDT