Re: erasmus and rev.

From: Jonathan Robie (jwrobie@mindspring.com)
Date: Mon Sep 06 1999 - 14:27:02 EDT

• Next message: Jim West: "re: Han's reader's lexicon"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: erasmus and rev."
• Maybe in reply to: Edward Hobbs: "Re: erasmus and rev."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

<x-flowed>At 08:56 PM 9/5/99 -0400, Kevin W. Woodruff wrote:

>I was always under the impression that Erasmus had in his work _Annotations
>on the New Testament_ (Novum Testamentum Annotationes) confessed (forgive me
>if my Latin is faulty):
>
>...quanquam in calce hujus libri, nonulla verba reperi apud nostros, quae
>aberant in Graecis exemplaribus, ea tamen ex latinis adjecimus."
>
>and that Erasmus called the manuscript his "exemplar vetustissimum"

Please forgive me if my Latin is non-existant. What do the above quotes say?

Jonathan

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
</x-flowed>

• Next message: Jim West: "re: Han's reader's lexicon"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: erasmus and rev."
• Maybe in reply to: Edward Hobbs: "Re: erasmus and rev."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:38 EDT