Re: Why is EMHS feminine

From: CEP7@aol.com
Date: Thu Sep 30 1999 - 10:19:05 EDT

Next message: Jim West: "Re: None"
Previous message: Joseph Brian Tucker: "Why is EMHS feminine"
Maybe in reply to: Joseph Brian Tucker: "Why is EMHS feminine"
Next in thread: Kevin W. Woodruff: "Re: Why is EMHS feminine"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 9/30/99 6:53:08 AM, music@riverviewcog.org writes:

<< hINA TO KAUCHMA hUMWN PERISSEUHi EN CRISTWi IHSOU EN EMOI DIA THS EMHS
PAROUSIAS PALIN PROS hUMAS - Phil 1:26

1. Why is EMHS feminine when it is referring to Paul?

Thanks
Brian Tucker
music@riverviewcog.org
Riverview, MI >>

EMHS is feminine because it is a possessive adjective which must agree with
the noun it modifies in number, gender, and case. Since PAROUSIAS is
feminine, so must EMHS be.

Charles Powell
DTS

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

Next message: Jim West: "Re: None"
Previous message: Joseph Brian Tucker: "Why is EMHS feminine"
Maybe in reply to: Joseph Brian Tucker: "Why is EMHS feminine"
Next in thread: Kevin W. Woodruff: "Re: Why is EMHS feminine"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:40 EDT