Re: Is GAR a coordinating or subordinating conjunction?

From: Kimmo Huovila (kimmo.huovila@helsinki.fi)
Date: Mon Dec 06 1999 - 14:54:26 EST


Michael Luper wrote:
> Thinking that a better grasp of English grammar on this matter might shed
> some light, I went back to a basic English Grammar book and found that "for"
> was understood to be a coordinating conjunction and was used in the
> following sentence:
> "Jack went to bed early, 'for' he was very tired."
>
> Then, I looked up subordinating conjunctions and found the following
> sentence:
> "Gerald read the book 'because' I recommended it."
>
> In both of these sentences it would appear that "for" and "because" are
> serving the same function, to introduce a cause or reason, and yet they are
> classified differently.
>

There is a difference with the English clauses. Try changing the order
of clauses:
(1) *For Jack was very tired, he went to bed early.
(2) Because I recommended the book, Gerald read it.

In the latter case the reason clause may be taken as a constituent of
the main clause.

Kimmo

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:48 EDT