From: Byron Knutson (byronk@open.org)
Date: Sun Dec 19 1999 - 03:22:21 EST
Regarding:
Philippians 4:3-4 and CAIRETE EN KURIWi PANTOTE PALIN ERW CAIRETE and
whether it can be construed as a continuation in the Greek of what precedes,
namely, TA hWN ONOMATA EN BIBLWI ZWHS.
I have come in on the tail end of this so I perhaps missed this, but what
about the attraction of the "hWN" in hWN ONOMATA EN BIBLWI ZWHS, to the
gen. - TWN LOIPWN SUNERGWN preceding it? That would seem to be a fairly
strong argument for taking TA hWN ONOMATA EN BIBLWI ZWHS with the preceding
verse rather than the following.
The other question that I puzzle over is "What difference in Paul's argument
does the phrase make if taken with the one rather than the other?", but that
goes beyond B-Greek doesn't it?
Sincerely,
Byron Knutson,
Salem, Oregon
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:50 EDT