Re: "Magdalene Papyrus"?

From: Jack Kilmon (jkilmon@historian.net)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2000 - 13:42:10 EDT

• Next message: Thomas J. Kraus: "Re: "Magdalene Papyrus"?"
• Previous message: Nichael Cramer: "Re: "Magdalene Papyrus"?"
• Maybe in reply to: Chris A Vlachos: ""Magdalene Papyrus"?"
• Next in thread: Thomas J. Kraus: "Re: "Magdalene Papyrus"?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Chris A Vlachos wrote:
>
> Have any of the UBS editors commented on the "Magdalene papyrus"?
> Do they accept it as a pre-AD70 document?

Thiede is all alone on this one. Every papyrologist
and palaeographer of note places these fragments
in the 2nd to 3rd century...still a significant
discovery.

Jack

-- 
______________________________________________
taybutheh d'maran yeshua masheecha am kulkon
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon@historian.net
http://www.historian.net
sharing a meal for free. 
http://www.thehungersite.com/
---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

• Next message: Thomas J. Kraus: "Re: "Magdalene Papyrus"?"
• Previous message: Nichael Cramer: "Re: "Magdalene Papyrus"?"
• Maybe in reply to: Chris A Vlachos: ""Magdalene Papyrus"?"
• Next in thread: Thomas J. Kraus: "Re: "Magdalene Papyrus"?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:41:05 EDT