From: Mark Wilson (emory2002@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 05 2000 - 00:39:30 EDT
<x-flowed>
1 Peter 1:1,2
Why is EKLEKTOIS (in verse 1) so far removed from KATA PROGNWSIN (in verse
2)?
Does this grammatical "dislocation" communicate something at the semantic
level?
Most commentaries I have checked somewhat note this structure but seem to be
more distracted by the larger issue of Election. Also, all commentaries I
referenced separated EKLEKTOIS from PAREPIDHOIS DIASPORAS, as if an
appositional relationship was not a consideration.
What am I to make of all this?
hH CARIS MEQ' hUMWN,
Mark Wilson
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
</x-flowed>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:28 EDT