[b-greek] Re: Smart's less contrived than Sharp's

From: One of the McKays (musicke@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Sun Feb 04 2001 - 21:40:33 EST


Dan, what sources can you cite which see "Saviour Jesus Christ" as a title
of Christ?
> In addition I view it as _very_ contrived to eliminate "Christ"
> and "Lord" from Sharp's rule but not "Savior Jesus Christ."
>

In the 5 instances of this in the NT, it would seem to me that the writer is
not using SWTHR as title:

... THS DOXHS TOU MEGALOU QEOU
KAI SWTHROS hHMWN
IHSOU CRISTOU [Titus 2:13]

 ...TOU QEOU hHMWN
KAI SWTHROS
IHSOU CRISTOU [2 Peter 1:1]

... TOU KURIOU hHMWN
KAI SWTHROS
IHSOU CRISTOU [2 Peter 1:11]

... TOU KURIOU [hHMWN]
KAI SWTHROS
IHSOU CRISTOU [2 Peter 2:20]

... TOU KURIOU hHMWN
KAI SWTHROS
IHSOU CRISTOU [2 Peter 3:18]

The NT clearly uses the title "Lord Jesus Christ" but I can't see "Saviour
Jesus Christ" as a title.

David McKay
musicke@ozemail.com.au






---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:49 EDT