[b-greek] Re: NIPTW

From: Jonathan Burke (jburke@sprint.com.au)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 08:34:08 EST

• Next message: HJBLUEBIRD@aol.com: "[b-greek] Re: The Morphology of Biblical Greek"
• Previous message: Polycarp66@aol.com: "[b-greek] Re: NIPTW"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>
I hardly think the seraphim are literally covering their feet.
>

KATEKALUPTON TOUS PODAS

Looks like feet to me.

>
The pudenda are clearly intended.
>

How so? Why didn't the LXX render the Hebrew more clearly?

Jonathan Burke.



---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

• Next message: HJBLUEBIRD@aol.com: "[b-greek] Re: The Morphology of Biblical Greek"
• Previous message: Polycarp66@aol.com: "[b-greek] Re: NIPTW"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:16 EDT