[b-greek] RE: past tense augment

From: Decker, Rodney (rdecker@bbc.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 09:47:12 EST


<x-html>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [b-greek] past tense augment</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>I've not time to answer this in detail here. It's been debated vigorously on the list before (search several years back for the most extensive discussions). I've addressed the augment question &amp; the imperfect in my book, *Temporal Deixis....* In (very) brief summary, the augment is viewed as a marker for secondary endings, not past tense. It is morphological, not semantically tensed.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Book info (on augment, see pp. 39f): &lt;http://faculty.bbc.edu/rdecker/deixis.htm&gt;.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>============================================</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Rodney J. Decker, Th.D.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Associate Prof/NT, Baptist Bible Seminary</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania, USA</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&lt;http://faculty.bbc.edu/rdecker/&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>PURL: &lt;http://purl.oclc.org/NT_Resources/&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>============================================</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Rbsads@aol.com [<A HREF="mailto:Rbsads@aol.com">mailto:Rbsads@aol.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:43 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: Biblical Greek</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: [b-greek] past tense augment</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>&nbsp;My question is concerning the grammarians who interpret verb form as rendering aspect and not time. For these it seems that temporal indications are entirely contextual.&nbsp; How do these grammarians understand the significance of the tense augment for the aorist and imperfect?&nbsp; Most explanations indicate that the augment indicates past tense, which of course is not consistent with an understanding of verbal form as rendering aspect only. </FONT></P>


---<BR>
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek>
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [
jwrobie@mindspring.com]<BR>
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu<BR>
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu<BR>
<BR>

</BODY>
</HTML>

</x-html>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:17 EDT