Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment

• To: sustag-public@amani.ces.ncsu.edu
• Subject: Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
• From: mhunt@postoffice.newnham.utas.edu.au (Mark A. Hunt)
• Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 12:15:27
• Organization: Dept. Plant Science, University of Tasmania
• References: <4u3avt$su3@condor.ic.net>, <4u3mdd$6r0_002@pm6-87.hal-pc.org>, <4u82ou$lli@sun3.uni-essen.de>
• Sender: london@sunsite.unc.edu

In article <320CF7CA.53C2@vgernet.net> Joseph Zorzin <redoak@vgernet.net> writes:
>From: Joseph Zorzin <redoak@vgernet.net>
>Subject: Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
>Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 16:57:46 -0400

>Hmmm.... I would suggest that the carrying capacity for homo sapiens on 
>this planet would be a few million, about what it was in the early 
>Paleolithic. I suspect not many will agree with me. <G>

I would agree with you. I thought about 25 million worldwide was probably a 
reasonable maximum figure, taking into account resource and genetic issues.

Cheers, Mark

• Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
• From: charliew@hal-pc.org (charliew)
• Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
• From: jwas@ix.netcom.com (jw)
• Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
• From: tomgray <tomgray@igc.apc.org>

• Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
• From: All locked up and nowhere to go <cage@critech.com>
• Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
• From: charliew@hal-pc.org (charliew)
• Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
• From: jbh@ILP.Physik.Uni-Essen.DE (Joshua B. Halpern)

• Prev: unsubscribe sanet-mg
• Next: Re: fHuman vs. natural influences on the environment
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread