Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy

• To: sustag-public@amani.ces.ncsu.edu
• Subject: Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
• From: mfriesel@ix.netcom.com
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 08:06:36 -0700
• Organization: Netcom
• References: <3289DD7D.69D7@ix.netcom.com>, <01bbd192$c0ab41e0$89d0d6cc@masher>, <56f87m$4dfn@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de>
• Reply-To: mfriesel@ix.netcom.com
• Sender: london@sunsite.unc.edu

Bruce Scott TOK wrote:
....
> 
> This must mean that a lot of population models (nonlinear ones with
> temporally intermittent behaviour) will have no carrying capacity.
> 
> Right?
> 


I note:

What continually amazes me is the number of Ashers and McCarthys who 
present themselves as experts at everything having to do with the 
environment and the economy, science, medicine and technology; and 
will do those trained in a given field the honor of defining their 
terms for them, will provide experts in a field with the correct 
interpretation of pertinent data, and tell them what information is 
pertinent and what is not as well.  All this for free!

• Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
• From: dlj@inforamp.net (David Lloyd-Jones)

• Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
• From: mfriesel@ix.netcom.com
• Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
• From: "Mike Asher" <masher@tusc.net>
• Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
• From: bds@ipp-garching.mpg.de (Bruce Scott TOK )

• Prev: Re: I will no longer respond to barks from the kennel.
• Next: Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread