[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Ecological Economics and Entropy
In article <56m5a6$o28@news.inforamp.net>,
dlj@inforamp.net (David Lloyd-Jones) wrote:
>>Steinn Sigurdsson accurately wrote:
>
>>> Jay Hanson's "definitions" are no more reliable for
>>> carrying capacity than they are for thermodynamics.
>
>Hanson illogically replied:
>
>>It is a problem to define human carrying capacity,
>>so it cant be done? Is that what passes for logic
>>at Cambridge?
>>
>>It never fails to amaze me that there are so many
>>idiots in universities. What do you do at Cambridge?
>>Sweep up?
>
>Jay,
>
>I think you're losing it. It is finally sinking in on you
that all
>your pseudo-science impresses nobody -- particularly nobody
in the
>fields into which you intrude as a loud poseur. As a
result you
>thrash around as above, without logic, without manners,
without
>dignity.
>
> -dlj.
Especially without manners. At this point in my life, I
don't expect people to agree with everything I say.
However, it would be nice, especially among people who claim
to prize free speech, to display good manners when
disagreeing with others. JH has demonstrated that he is
probably incapable of this.
References: