Re: Eph 2:15 - EIS hENA KAINON ANQRWPON POIWN *EIRHNHN*
Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Thu, 30 Jan 1997 07:09:43 -0600
At 6:06 AM -0600 1/30/97, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>At 10:57 AM 1/29/97 -0600, Carl W. Conrad wrote:
>
>>Would the following formulation muddle things still further, or is it any
>>easier to grasp the author's intent in 2:14-15? Of course it's still not
>>complete, since the thought continues on into 16.
>>
>>AUTOS GAR ESTIN hH EIRHNH hHMWN, TO MEN MESOTOICON TOU FRAGMOU LUSAS hWSTE
>>TA AMFOTERA hEN POIHSAI, EN DE THi SARKI AUTOU THN TE ECQRAN KAI TON NOMON
>>TWN EN DOGMASIN ENTOLWN KATARGHSAS hWSTE THN EIHRHNHN POIEIN, TOUS DUO EIS
>>hENA KAINON ANQRWPON EN AUTWi KTIZWN ...
>
>I find that clearer. Should we submit it to UBS for their next edition ;->
MH GENOITO! KAQWS GAR GEGRAPTAI EN TWi KATA IWANNHN EUAGGELIWi, hO GEGRAFA
GEGRAFA.
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
(314) 935-4018
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cwc@oui.com
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/