>Here's where the ACCENTS are important, Jonathan. It's: hO\. Unless the
>article hO is followed by an enclitic (e.g. hO/ GE), it NEVER has an
>accent; when you see a hO with an accent and there's NO following enclitic,
>it can only be a relative pronoun, as it is in fact here: n.sg. relative
>pronoun acc., object of NOHSAI, and I think I would explain this as an
>anticipatory relative clause in apposition to THN SUNESIN MOU, deeming PROS
>as having THN SUNESIN MOU as its chief object.
OK, I admit it, I don't pay much attention to accents on one-syllable
words...I've been burned more than once on this.
I'm bogging down when I try to figure out what you mean here, Carl. I think
you are saying that:
PROS - THN SUNESIN MOU: The object of PROS is THN SUNESIN MOU.
NOISAI hO/ DUNASQE ANAGIWSKONTES: hO/ is the object of NOHSAI
But I still can't get this to turn into a meaningful sentence...
Jonathan
***************************************************************************
Jonathan Robie
POET Software, 3207 Gibson Road, Durham, N.C., 27703
Ph: 919.598.5728 Fax: 919.598.6728
email: jwrobie@mindspring.com, jonathan@poet.com
http://www.poet.com <--- shockwave enabled!
***************************************************************************