Eph 2:18 & the consecutive hOTI

CEP7@aol.com
Tue, 18 Feb 1997 10:01:44 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Karen Pitts: "Re: 1st year Greek grammars"
Previous message: Paul Zellmer: "Tapos na (was AGAPAW in John 21)"
Next in thread: Ronald Wong: "Re: Eph 2:18 & the consecutive hOTI"

What are the merits of the hOTI of Eph 2:18 being consecutiive rather than
causal. While I realize causal is far more common and consecutive is rare,
consecutive seems to make better sense in the context.

Charles Powell
DTS

Next message: Karen Pitts: "Re: 1st year Greek grammars"
Previous message: Paul Zellmer: "Tapos na (was AGAPAW in John 21)"
Next in thread: Ronald Wong: "Re: Eph 2:18 & the consecutive hOTI"