Re: Heb. 2:3 LABOUSA

Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Tue, 11 Mar 1997 07:32:52 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ronald Wong: "Re: Pronoun Emphasis"
Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Dative in John 4:23"
In reply to: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Heb. 2:3 LABOUSA"

At 5:36 AM -0600 3/11/97, Carl W. Conrad wrote:
>. . . might more
>"naturally" have been formulated (the whole clause, that is, in a more
>"standard" Greek) as hHTIS PRWTH LALEISQEISA DIA TOU KURIOU EBEBAIWQH EIS
>hHMAS hUPO TWN AKOUSANTWN.

I really ought to proofread my messages a bit more carefully; the aorist
passive feminine participle above should, of course, be LALHQEISA. ELEHSATE
EME!

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
(314) 935-4018
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cwc@oui.com
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/

Next message: Ronald Wong: "Re: Pronoun Emphasis"
Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Dative in John 4:23"
In reply to: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Heb. 2:3 LABOUSA"