[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OU+PAS (Romans 9:6 reconsidered)
- To: b-greek@virginia.edu
- Subject: Re: OU+PAS (Romans 9:6 reconsidered)
- From: Jim Beale <eghx@gdeb.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 18:25:21 -0400
- In-Reply-To: Micheal Palmer <mwpalmer@earthlink.net> "Re: OU+PAS (Romans 9:6 reconsidered)" (Jun 3, 11:46pm)
- References: <l03010d00afba55487b6a@[38.11.183.6]>
On Jun 3, 11:46pm, Micheal Palmer wrote:
> >I've found two kinds of verses in which OU+PAS is found. In the
> >first kind, OU is construed with PAS. In these OU negates the
> >universal affirmative proposition producing a particular negative
> >proposition; ~(All a is b) becomes (Some a is not b). In the second
> >kind, OU is construed with the verb, producing a universal affirmation
> >(or negation depending on the way the relation is written). Of this
> >latter class are two important verses: Rom 3:20, Gal 2:16.
> >
> >This means that OU, in Romans 9:6, is to be construed with PANTES
> >to the effect that OU negates the universal affirmative proposition,
> >"all who are of ethnic Israel are of elect Israel" to produce the
> >particular negative "some who are of ethnic Israel are not of elect
> >Israel." If OU was construed with the implicit verb EISIN, then the
> >result would be that no one of ethnic Israel was elect, which is
> >clearly not the case. This is what John Piper did, and I think it
> >is a mistake (though he did arrive at the correct result anyway!)
>
> What criteria are you using to determine whether a particular case belongs
> to one type or the other? Are you going solely on word order, taking OU to
> negate the word immediately adjacent to it, or are you using other
> criteria? If so, what are they? Your proposal sounds very interesting. I
> would be interested in seening some more of the detail.
Hi Micheal,
The criteria is based on word order. I have assumed that for OU
to be construed with PAS, rather than the verb, the verb should
not intervene between OU and PAS.
OU construed with PAS:
Matthew 7:21 ................ OU PAS
Matthew 19:11 ............... OU PANTES
John 13:10 .................. OUXI PANTES
John 13:18 .................. OU PERI PANTWN
Acts 10:41 .................. OU PANTI
Romans 9:6 .................. OU GAR PANTES
Romans 10:16 ................ OU PANTES
1 Corinthians 6:12 .......... OU PANTA
1 Corinthians 15:39 ......... OU PASA
2 Thessalonians 3:2 ......... OU GAR PANTWN
OU construed with the verb:
Matthew 24:22 ............... OUK AN ESWQH PASA
Romans 3:20 ................. OU DIKAIWQHSETAI PASA
1 John 2:19 ................. OUK EISIN PANTES
There may be more, but these are all the ones I know of.
In Christ,
Jim Beale
References: