[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELEOS in Matt 12:7
- To: dmills@creighton.edu
- Subject: Re: ELEOS in Matt 12:7
- From: "John M. Moe" <John.M.Moe-1@tc.umn.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 18:24:47 +0000
- CC: b-greek@virginia.edu
- Organization: St. John's Lutheran Rich Valley
- References: <Pine.HPP.3.95.970610171150.4067A-100000@bluejay.creighton.edu>
- Reply-To: John M Moe <John.M.Moe-1@tc.umn.edu>
dmills@creighton.edu wrote:
>
> How do we explain the nominative in ELEOS QELW KAI OU QUSIAN and in the
> similar words in the LXX? The LXX reads ELEOS QELW H QUSIAN. Was it a
> mistake in the LXX, and if so, why didn't the NT writer change it? He
> changed H to KAI OU. I notice that some manuscripts read ELEON.
>
> David R. Mills
> ESL Instructor
> Creighton University
> dmills@creighton.edu
David,
Just for clarification, where in the LXX are you finding ELEOS QELW H
QUSIAN? at Hosea 6:6 I find ELEOS QELW KAI OU QUSIAN. IS there another
occurance of the phrase which has H?
Thanks.
John M. Moe
Follow-Ups:
References: