> Not at all - it just that we don't have Jesus actual words (other than
>
> potentially wrong reconstructions) so why not stick to the inspired,
> inerrant (in my view) words we do have?
As the above clearly demonstrates, this topic has run out of
scholarship.
Linguistics, form and literary criticism, the relation of translational
Greek
to the Aramaic are all appropriate topics. I hope you understand when I
decline
to tackle the "inerrancy" view. Time to let it rest.
-- Dâman dith laych idneh dânishMA nishMA Jack Kilmon (jpman@accesscomm.net)