[Fwd: DIKAIOSUNH in Romans]

Eric Weiss (eweiss@gte.net)
Wed, 05 Nov 1997 08:43:06 -0800

Excuse me, please! My link to the Lloyd Gaston article in this message I
just sent should be
http://www.jcrelations.com/articl1/gaston4.htm - I omitted a forward
slash. Sorry for cluttering your mail!
--
"Eric S. Weiss"
eweiss@gte.net
http://home1.gte.net/eweiss/index.htm

Message-ID: <3460A0C7.D23013DE@gte.net> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 08:37:28 -0800 From: Eric Weiss <eweiss@gte.net> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Biblical Greek <b-greek@virginia.edu> Subject: Re: DIKAIOSUNH in Romans Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1117B91A9C4168D0AAA887AA"

Having been the original poster of this query, let me give a parting thought, if only to reference the suggested article I list at the end of this message. Thanks to all for their comments on what Paul might mean by this phrase, including Edgar Krentz who off-list sent me some suggestions for reading.

A brief (but not unrelated, I hope) theological indulgence: My several-months'-long wrestling to comprehend Romans 1:16-17 (not over yet!) - complete with various intelligent and not-so-intelligent queries to B-Greek over those same months - is causing a paradigm shift in my thinking - one that is away from "Luther's legacy" to Protestants/Evangelicals that the "theme verse" of Romans is 1:17b with the concurrent idea that the "theme" of the epistle is "justification by faith/imputation of righteousness" - and one that is toward the idea that it is God's righteous faithfulness to his covenant/promises - perhaps through the "faithfulness of Jesus Christ" - that is the apostle's theme. Needless to say, this is a not-oft-heard interpretation in evangelical/charismatic circles/teachings/publications, where a believer is taught that he/she is saved by his (or her) "faith" as opposed to God's (or Christ's) faithfulness/righteousness (though both may be true) - or at least I never heard it in my 20 years. But I think it is one that Christians such as myself would do well to consider or give ear to - and this "view" is in my opinion one that must be considered when interpreting the Greek text of Romans (and Galatians) - hence my indulgence here on B-Greek. (Okay, I'll stop preaching!) For those interested in reading an interesting essay on this interpretation - especially those of you who were kind enough to respond to my query on DIKAIOSUNH - I found last night this 1980 article (19 pages to print out) by Prof. Lloyd Gaston entitled "Abraham and the Righteousness of God" at http://www.jcrelations.com.articl1/gaston4.htm Please feel free to e-mail me off list if you have any additional thoughts about this theological interpretation. Thanks!

---
"Eric S. Weiss"
eweiss@gte.net
http://home1.gte.net/eweiss/index.htm

Having been the original poster of this query, let me give a parting thought, if only to reference the suggested article I list at the end of this message. Thanks to all for their comments on what Paul might mean by this phrase, including Edgar Krentz who off-list sent me some suggestions for reading.

A brief (but not unrelated, I hope) theological indulgence: My several-months'-long wrestling to comprehend Romans 1:16-17 (not over yet!) - complete with various intelligent and not-so-intelligent queries to B-Greek over those same months - is causing a paradigm shift in my thinking - one that is away from "Luther's legacy" to Protestants/Evangelicals that the "theme verse" of Romans is 1:17b with the concurrent idea that the "theme" of the epistle is "justification by faith/imputation of righteousness" - and one that is toward the idea that it is God's righteous faithfulness to his covenant/promises - perhaps through the "faithfulness of Jesus Christ" - that is the apostle's theme. Needless to say, this is a not-oft-heard interpretation in evangelical/charismatic circles/teachings/publications, where a believer is taught that he/she is saved by his (or her) "faith" as opposed to God's (or Christ's) faithfulness/righteousness (though both may be true) - or at least I never heard it in my 20 years. But I think it is one that Christians such as myself would do well to consider or give ear to - and this "view" is in my opinion one that must be considered when interpreting the Greek text of Romans (and Galatians) - hence my indulgence here on B-Greek. (Okay, I'll stop preaching!) For those interested in reading an interesting essay on this interpretation - especially those of you who were kind enough to respond to my query on DIKAIOSUNH -  I found last night this 1980 article (19 pages to print out) by Prof. Lloyd Gaston entitled "Abraham and the Righteousness of God" at http://www.jcrelations.com.articl1/gaston4.htm  Please feel free to e-mail me off list if you have any additional thoughts about this theological interpretation. Thanks!

---
"Eric S. Weiss"
eweiss@gte.net
http://home1.gte.net/eweiss/index.htm