Re: Q and Papias

• To: Larry Swain <lswain@billings.lib.mt.us>
• Subject: Re: Q and Papias
• From: David Coomler <davidco@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us>
• Date: Sat, 29 Oct 1994 10:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: David Coomler <davidco@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us>, b-greek@virginia.edu
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9410290909.A85118-0100000@rs6a.wln.com>

On Sat, 29 Oct 1994, Larry Swain wrote:

> If Mark is using Matthew, 
> his use of Matthew is going to be conditioned on his ability to cut and 
> paste into his own work.  If that ability is puerile, then the result is 
> puerile.
> 

If that were true, then one is hard-pressed to account for the survival of
a crude, later Mark in the presence of a more elegant and developed
earlier Matthew.  

(p.s. Is anyone subscribed to OT Hebrew, and if so, how did you do it?  I
am having trouble with the standard Listserv subscriber info).

David

• Re: Q and Papias
• From: Larry Swain <lswain@billings.lib.mt.us>

• Re: Q and Papias
• From: Larry Swain <lswain@billings.lib.mt.us>

• Prev: Re: Q and Papias
• Next: Re: Q and Papias
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread