Re: post prepared for anglican (aka reversible translation)

From: Lee R. Martin (lmartin@voyageronline.net)
Date: Thu May 22 1997 - 00:49:33 EDT

Next message: BTHURMAN@unca.edu: "argument by the beard"
Previous message: David M. Scholer: "Re: 1 Thess."
In reply to: Eric Weiss: "Re: post prepared for anglican (aka reversible translation)"
Maybe reply: Eric Weiss: "Re: post prepared for anglican (aka reversible translation)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Eric Weiss wrote:
>

> Even Taylor (Living Bible) and Phillips (his own translation) called
> their works "paraphrases," I believe, so they must have recognized a
> difference.

I sent my two-cents-worth before I read this post.

The Living Bible is a paraphrase because Ken Taylor stated the message
of the KJV in "different words" from the KJV, both works being in
English.

-- 
Lee R. Martin
Adjunct Faculty in Old Testament and Hebrew
Church of God School of Theology
Cleveland, TN 37311
Pastor, Prospect Church of God

Next message: BTHURMAN@unca.edu: "argument by the beard"
Previous message: David M. Scholer: "Re: 1 Thess."
In reply to: Eric Weiss: "Re: post prepared for anglican (aka reversible translation)"
Maybe reply: Eric Weiss: "Re: post prepared for anglican (aka reversible translation)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:16 EDT