From: A. C. Livengood, Sr. (livngood@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Thu Jan 29 1998 - 18:21:02 EST
Greetings!
< snip >
> CWC Response: I've checked Smyth, and I don't really think that his
> discussion in ##2895ff on MEN quite explains what we have here or
> indicates that a MEN can be followed by several additional DE's. If,
> however, you look at what Smyth has to say about DE at #2834, you do read:
> RDE serves to mark that something is different from what precedes, but
> only to offset it, not to exclude or contradict it ...S Then consider
> #2905, which comes somewhat closer to what we see in Eph 4:11. At any
> rate, I know that I've seen MEN used with a succession of DE's more than a
> couple times.
EUREKA! NOW I GET IT!!!
Thanks so very much for your time and guidance!
Sincerely,
Andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:00 EDT