Re: Philippians 1:1-2

From: Joseph Brian Tucker (music@riverviewcog.org)
Date: Sat Sep 04 1999 - 12:49:28 EDT

• Next message: Steve Puluka: "Re: 3 questions"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Philippians 1:1-2"
• Maybe in reply to: Joseph Brian Tucker: "Philippians 1:1-2"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Carl

[snipped]

Thanks for the very helpful post.
verse 1
PAULOS KAI TIMOQEOS DOULOI CRISTOU IHSOU PASIN TOIS hAGIOIS EN CRISTOWi
IHSOU TOIS OUSIN EN FILIPPOIS SUN EPISKOPOIS KAI DIAKONOIS,
verse 2
CARIS hUMIN KAI EIRHNH APO QEOU PATROS hHMWN KAI KURIOU IHSOU CRISTOU.

What verb is implied in verse 2 and what would be its form?

What is the syntactical relationship between QEOU PATROS hMWN KAI KURIOU
IHSOU CHISTOU? Does this imply a distinction? If this is theological feel
free to ignore it, my purpose is to understand if the grammar indicates a
strong distinction.

Thanks

Brian Tucker
music@riverviewcog.org
Riverview, MI

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

• Next message: Steve Puluka: "Re: 3 questions"
• Previous message: Carl W. Conrad: "Re: Philippians 1:1-2"
• Maybe in reply to: Joseph Brian Tucker: "Philippians 1:1-2"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:37 EDT