Matt. 22:14-Rhetorical Device?

From: Ilvgrammta@aol.com
Date: Tue Dec 21 1999 - 23:30:34 EST

• Next message: Bill Ross: "RE: Matt. 22:14-Rhetorical Device?"
• Previous message: Bill Ross: "RE: 1 john 2:1"
• Next in thread: Bill Ross: "RE: Matt. 22:14-Rhetorical Device?"
• Maybe reply: Bill Ross: "RE: Matt. 22:14-Rhetorical Device?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Greetings B-Greekers!

Thanks for all the help of late. Your replies really have aided my
educational advancement.

The question I have about Matt. 22:14 is a simple one. My Classics professor
really got me hooked on rhetorical devices when we were studying Latin. He
often talks about antimetabole and its employment in the NT (see 1 Cor.
14:20). I therefore wonder--is Matt. 22:14 a case of antimetabole or just
simply antithetical parallelism?

POLLOI GAR EISIN KLHTOI OLIGOI DE EKLEKTOI.

Thanks in advance,

Edgar Foster

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu

• Next message: Bill Ross: "RE: Matt. 22:14-Rhetorical Device?"
• Previous message: Bill Ross: "RE: 1 john 2:1"
• Next in thread: Bill Ross: "RE: Matt. 22:14-Rhetorical Device?"
• Maybe reply: Bill Ross: "RE: Matt. 22:14-Rhetorical Device?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:51 EDT