From: Dave Washburn (dwashbur@nyx.net)
Date: Sun Jun 03 2001 - 16:34:49 EDT
Clay,
> on 6/3/01 9:46 AM, Dave Washburn wrote:
>
> > We have profuse examples of his use of AMHN LEGW SOI/hUMIN
> > etc as an introductory formula, and to my knowledge there is not
> > another example of his modifying it with SHMERON.
>
> Dave,
>
> Not sure if this is what you are looking for but Mk 14:30 reads:
>
> . . . AMHN LEGW SOI hOTI SU SHMERON TAUTHi THi NUKTI . . .
>
> SHMERON in this context is pleonastic and looks like it might be a
> conflation of Matthew and Luke but probably not. Anyway not much question
> about which clause SHMERON is attached to in Mk 14:30.
It's also preceded by hOTI, which obviously introduces a new
clause, and by SU which is the subject of the next clause. Hardly
a parallel case to Luke 23:43 where we have no such indicators.
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
"You just keep thinking, Butch. That's what you're good at."
---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:58 EDT