From: c stirling bartholomew (cc.constantine@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Fri Jun 08 2001 - 01:19:01 EDT
on 6/7/01 9:51 PM, c stirling bartholomew wrote:
> C.E.B. Cranfield accepts the NA/UBS reading but he attaches KATA SARKA with
> hHMWN not TON PROPATORA. Cranfield's analysis really left me dumbfounded. I
> just don't get it. I would make both hHMWN and KATA SARKA limiting
> constituents attached to TON PROPATORA.
I think there is a better way of viewing this. Lets say that KATA SARKA
limits TON PROPATORA hHMWN as a unit, not TON PROPATORA or hHMWN. This may
be what Cranfield is driving at but it isn't what he said.
Clay
--
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:59 EDT