> At 04:46 PM 9/24/97 +0000, Andrew Kulikovsky wrote:
> >Filoi,
> >
> >I get the impression, from a number of posts on this list (and other
> >lists as well) that being an inerrantist is being unscholarly - it's as
> >though the attitude is well, "you're an inerrantist - that speaks for
> >itself - you can't be a thinking scholar and an inerrantist". In other
> >words "only a complete moron would be an inerrantist."
>
> If this is in response to the 1 John 2:7-8 thread, I really don't get it. I
> never claimed that 1 John contained any errors.
>
No Jonathan, relax, it had nothing to do with you.
cheers,
Andrew