From: Wayne Leman (wleman@mcn.net)
Date: Sat May 06 2000 - 17:02:50 EDT
Carl reparteed:
>allegorically. And the next step is hO LOGOS; we can add TOU QEOU if we
>feel so inclined, but we don't really feel any necessity to make that
>clarification.
>
>Perilous waters, these. Parmenides once said we can only carry on
>intelligent conversation about hO TI ESTIN, that there's no talking at all
>about hO TI OUK ESTIN.
True, my empiricist friend, but if you want to be one of the blessed:
MAKARIOI HOI MH IDONTES KAI PISTEUSANTES (John 20.29)
and PISTIS, well, you know that it's:
PRAGMATWN ELEGXOS OU BLEPOMENWN (Heb. 11.1)
<G>
Wayne,
who also finds it very hard to believe in what he hasn't seen
---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:24 EDT