1 Clement 23:3, 23:5, 34:6, 35:7, 45:2, 53:1
2 Clement 2:4, 6:8, 14:1f
Barnabas 4:7, 4:11, 5:4, 6:12, 13:2, 16:5
Petruskerygma 4 p. 16, 6
I don't have ready access to them. Also, BAGD makes the following
interesting comment:
"The close acquaintance of Christians with Scripture has its parallels in
the familiarity of the greeks with Homer Herclit. Sto. 1 p. 2 1. 3ff: EK
PRWTHS hHLIKIAS the child is trained on Homer. To the end of his life he
occupies himself with Homer's works."
Here's the original message I sent:
Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu) wrote:
> I fear that Jonathan opened a can of worms yesterday with the question of
> whether GRAFAI in 2 Tim 3:16 can refer to writings other than "scriptures."
Now, Carl, you know I would never open a can of worms ;->
> Through a freak accident that I have described in embarrassing
> detail previously, I've lost my BAGD. What does it say? Does it give any
> guidance regarding the perhaps naive questions I raise below in response to
> Fred Nofer's message?
Let me try outlining BAGD's discussion of GRAFH:
1. a little book (not a NT meaning)
2. in the NT exclusively w. a sacred meaning, of Holy Scripture
2.A. hH GRAFH the individual scripture passage
2.B. Scripture as a whole
2.B.a. the plural hAI GRAFAI : "the scriptures"
2.B.b. the singular as designation of scripture as a whole
BAGD cites 2 Tim 3:16 in category 2.A. As for the scriptures Fred Nofer
cited, BAGD cites 1 Timothy 5:18 as 2.B.b. and 2 Peter 3:15-16 as 2.B.a. I
find this surprising - I would have classified them both as 2.A. There are a
number of references to the early patristic writings; unfortunately, I don't
have ready access to these writings.
In Louw and Nida, they clearly specified "Old Testament" rather than "Holy
Scripture" for category 2. BAGD leaves it more open.
> >Also, in I Timothy 5:18, GRAFH is apparently used to refer to both Deut.
> >25:4 and Luke 10:7.
>
> This is a somewhat more complicated passage. Again let me cite it for
> clearer reference:
>
> 18 LEGEI GAR hH GRAFH, 'BOUN ALOWNTA OU FIMWSEIS,' KAI, 'AXIOS hO
> ERGATHS TOU MISQOU AUTOU.'
hH GRAFH is singular here. Doesn't it apply only to the first quote?
Jonathan
***************************************************************************
Jonathan Robie
POET Software, 3207 Gibson Road, Durham, N.C., 27703
Ph: 919.598.5728 Fax: 919.598.6728
email: jwrobie@mindspring.com, jonathan@poet.com
http://www.poet.com <--- shockwave enabled!
***************************************************************************